One of the most difficult aspects of putting a portfolio together is deciding
what to put in it and what to leave out. Everyone has a different
idea of what should be in a portfolio. I have done many portfolio
reviews at the National Press Photographers Association annual conferences.
Here students and photographers looking to have their work critiqued go
from photo editor to photo editor looking for advice. By the end
of the session, they always end up in a state of confusion because
every photo editor will say something different ...
One will say "Take this photo out." while another will say "Leave
it in." One will say "You need more of this and less of that"
while another will say "You need more of that and less of this."
Some say 12 pieces are enough, some say you should have at least 24.
Some say every portfolio should have sports, spot news, features, and a
picture story. Others will say only put them in if they are good.
Whatever the case maybe, there are no set rules, even though some photo
editors will say that there are.
A CROSS SECTION OF OPINION
Personally, I love slides, but that is not practical today. Nicely
toned images, put together in a simple, well thought out presentation
and burned on
a CD are nice. I do not like them on a web site if they are the only
photos being submitted.
As far as content goes, I don't care what you put in, as long as YOU
feel is a good representation of your abilities, YOU like it, and
YOU are proud of it and YOU think it is acceptable work to be published
in a community newspaper. I want to see if you can feel, then
photograph and deliver emotion to the reader. From there, I
can pick up your style and see your potential, no matter how inexperienced
you are. I want to see dedication and enthusiasm in your portfolio.
I want to see if I think you have to ability and desire to learn.
But keep in mind, I also need to know that if I send you to a sports
assignment you can do it. Here are some things I do hate:
-
Shots that are copies of great photos, like the oh-so-common photograph
of "a person walking with an umbrella from a birds eye view" or the "man
putting up a new billboard" shot. If you are going to put these in
your portfolio, they had better be REAL good, have something different
about them and not be cliché'.
-
Large oversized S.A.S.E. envelopes, that are twice as big as your portfolio
-- they are hard to store and pile up with others.
- Poor presentation of work, especially dark, ugly, off color
images -- which I see a lot of.
-
Phone calls at my office even though I put "No phone calls please" in my
ad.
-
Long, boring cover letters and resumes that are so poorly laid out, I have
to read the whole thing to find out where you are working now.
Here are some opinions of other editors:
Clem Murray
Dir. of Photography
The Philadelphia Inquirer
Curt Chandler
Pittsburgh Post Gazette
Jim McKnight
Photo Chief
Associated Press / Albany
Bill Ostendorf
Managing editor/visuals
The Providence Journal
Alan Youngblood
Photo Editor
Star-Banner
Ocala, FL
Bob Croslin
Staff Photographer
The Tampa Tribune
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Clem Murray
Dir. of Photography
The Philadelphia Inquirer
"It's important to show the reviewer that you can handle the typical
newspaper assignment of news, features and sports. The challenge
is to make
each and every image in the portfolio "sing". You make them sing
by
capturing fleeting moments; by getting a unique angle that no one else
sees;
by unique composition of elements; by use of different lenses.
In this age
of visual overload, our job as photojournalists is to surprise
the readers.
Show them something they didn't expect.
If you're trying to get a job, you have to surprise the photo editor
with
your images as well. I know that each and every photographer
on the planet
can get a cute photo of kids playing. I don't need to see it
in a
portfolio. Same goes for entertainers performing or famous people
at
microphones. Or silhouetted firemen against a blazing inferno.
To stand out from the pack of photojournalists competing for the relatively
few number of jobs you have to demonstrate that you can get beyond
the
obvious photo.
I always want to see a long-term photo story as part of a portfolio.
It
shows how close, in terms of capturing the true essence of a subject,
a
photographer can get to his/her subjects.
As for format, I don't really care how people send their images:
slides,
CD, Zip, prints. Even clips or xeroxes! If they are submitted
digitally,
please make sure they are in a program that automatically displays
them.
Nothing is harder, and more time consuming on a photo editor, than
to open
20-40 images in Photoshop. Don't do it, it's a real big turn-off.
Resumes should always contain named references. Don't make the
photo editor
have to call you to get names. What a waste of time. Put
them on the
resume so s/he can check up on you first before starting the interview
process.
Make sure your portfolio package is addressed to a person and not "Dear
Photo Editor." Make sure it's the right person too! And
finally, make sure
your cover letter and resume contain no mistakes. I usually get
a
half-dozen letters a year where the name of the paper is spelled with
an "E"
and not an "I"!"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Curt Chandler
Pittsburgh Post Gazette
" I want to see a photographer's
best work in their portfolio. I
don't care if it is digital files, prints or slides as long as its
good.
The number of images is not as important as the quality. One of the
best
portfolios I've seen recently had two picture stories and four singles.
Not much volume, but every frame was a killer. I want photographers
to
be passionate about their best work, so I look for people who can edit
themselves well enough to demonstrate that they know the difference
between an outstanding photo and a routine image.
A portfolio should demonstrated
versatility and range, but also
reflect the type of work a photographer wants to do. If you hate sports,
show me in one frame that you can do it in a pinch. If you love fashion,
show two or three examples of your best work.
Picture stories are important.
They demonstrate story-telling
ability and motivation. I see lots of good singles portfolios, then
hear
tons of excuses about how the photographer doesn't have time to shoot
a
story. Put yourself in my place. Who is going to be a better hire,
the
photographer with all the excuses, or someone who found a way to beat
the odds in a bad situation and produced a great story?
I look for photographers
who generate good ideas, then use them
to produce great pictures. Nothing looks worse in a portfolio than
a
poorly executed copy of a photo that won in a contest the year before.
Finally, I look for style.
Photographers who see the world a
little differently can shoot the same old thing, but produce pictures
that tell wonderful stories in a way I haven't seen before. I like
to be
surprised by a fresh approach or a different point of view."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim McKnight
Photo Chief
Associated Press / Albany
"NO "famous" people. Beginning photojournalist seem to think
that it is important to include some "famous" person in their portfolio.
Most times the image would not be put in anyone's portfolio if it
were not a famous person.
Less is better and never two of the same thing.
Never, never have two images from the same sport. This allows the
viewer to think " image A is better than B, why did the photog put B in
their portfolio? They should know that A is better and therefore
left out B."
Put different sports in the portfolio. Stay
away from football, hockey,
baseball, all the normal stuff. The viewer may have just
put down the
latest Sports mag with some knock-your-socks-off images of the sport
you
have in your portfolio. Bet you don't see many curling, soccer,
bocci,
lacrosse, field hockey, speed skating, or snow boarding in most sports
portfolios.
And lastly, no clippings. I don't care
if you have ever been
published. I only care about the images you produce.
So you now have had an interview at the Daily Weekly.
How do you keep
bugging them about a job without bugging them? Use the medium.
Once a month
send them a photo postcard with your best image of that month. Don't
send a
letter. Just a nice 4x6 or 5x7 print sent as a postcard with
something like
" I shot this last week and thought you might like to see it". They
can put
it in your file, or toss it but it takes up little of their time to
look at
the image. They don't even need a letter opener."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bill Ostendorf
Managing editor/visuals
The Providence Journal
"Portfolios shouldn't be
assembled like a grocery list: 2 from sports, 2 from
news, 2 from portraiture. Many students put weak photos in their
portfolios to
show they can shoot sports or have photographed famous people.
These images
stand out in their portfolios immediately because they are often the
weakest
pictures. They also put some photos in because they were hard to get
or they
fondly remember the situation. None of this has any place in a portfolio.
Tight editing is critical.
Only your best work should be in your portfolio.
When editors sort through dozens or hundreds of portfolios, it is the
weak
images that quickly sort out the also-rans. Think about it:
If I see three or
four weak photos in your portfolio, I can safely assume you don't have
any
more good work to show. But if everything is strong, I assume
there might even
be more excellent pictures than you are showing me.
Cropping is also important,
especially to students who often haven't yet
learned to crop in the viewfinder. Crop each image carefully. When
you think
you are done, crop again. Only leave in what portions of the frame
that
contribute information.
What do I like in a portfolio?
Storytelling images. Pictures that have
emotion, humor, personality. Good use of foreground and background.
Variety.
Compassion. Content. Good use of light, color, patterns and texture.
Technical
quality. Respect for subjects. Style. Risk taking. Surprise.
And don't forget to keep
your portfolio in perspective. I don't hire
portfolios. I hire people. I hire their intelligence, ethics,
energy and
experience. I look for team players and people who know they
can learn more
and get better. I want people who care and are curious.
I meet photographers every
year who spend endless hours working on their
portfolios but don't think for five minutes what to say to me, what
questions
to ask, how to present themselves as people. And they wonder
why they never
get hired.
As far as follow-up goes,
I generally prefer to make the phone calls. Written
or e-mail follow-up is fine, but if every applicant called me, I'd
never get off
the phone."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Alan Youngblood
Photo Editor
Star-Banner
Ocala, FL
My first experience hiring
as a Photo Editor, I posted an ad on the
JIB and I thought I was very specific - It was not an entry level position
it was
a spot for an experienced person: 5 years minimum experience,
location
lighting experience, sports, etc. etc. etc.
The portfolios I got were
unbelievable. I received over 70 portfolios
and 80% of the applicants did not meet my minimum requirements for
experience that I had posted. I looked at each and every portfolio,
and the
photographs of those 80% had images that matched their skill level,
not the
experience I was looking for. There were no diamonds in the rough
there.
Hence, my advice for students
and others when applying for jobs is to
read the ads and comply with what the perspective employer is asking
for.
Make an honest self evaluation - If the job is beyond your skill level
at this
time, DON'T APPLY. You will just be giving the already busy Photo
Editor more work to do.
Most of the time I take
Ed's advice - "You can't win if you don't enter."
However, in the hiring process, I'll remember those applicants that
completely
disregarded my request and bogged me down with a bunch of unnecessary
work next time.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bob Croslin
Staff Photographer
The Tampa Tribune
Having looked at a bunch
of digital portfolios lately, the thing that struck
me the most was that everyone of them had glitches: Pictures
wouldn't show up,
some photos looked flaky, etc.
I've heard it said before
I agree: Instead of a slide show app, do it with html.
Put together a clean and simple to navigate web site and save the whole
thing to
removable media.
Doing it this way will also
ensure that it is cross-platform. In my case, I
work for a paper that has PCs in the photo dept. and a few Macs in
graphics.
It's always a pain to find a Mac workstation so it's work to look at
some of the
portfolios. In some cases, if it's work to look at a digital
portfolio when there is
a light table and a nicely presented slide portfolio sitting nearby
- the slide
portfolio will be the first to be looked at every time.